In curating an exhibition for Black History Month on the topic of the legacies of slavery and abolition in Manchester, I focussed first on the physical space of the Portico Library, the site of this show. The Portico opened its doors in 1806, just months before Parliament voted to abolish the Atlantic slave trade.
The institution’s first chairman, John Ferriar, was a passionate anti-slavery campaigner whose play The Prince of Angola , based on Aphra Behn’s 1688 novel Oroonoko, was designed to promote the anti-slavery cause. Many of his fellow Library member’s names appear on Manchester’s 1806 petition to Parliament supporting the ending of the transatlantic slave trade. Many other early members, including plantation owners, cotton merchants, and Sir Robert Peel (father of the future Prime Minister also named Robert Peel), signed a petition that same year for the continuation of the trade.
Visitors to Bristol can easily find signs of the city’s involvement in the Atlantic slave trade through the prominently placed statue of the merchant Edward Colston, and the concert hall bearing his name. In Liverpool, the wealth generated by slave commerce is commemorated by the street called The Goree, named after an island off Dakar, Senegal, which was for centuries the largest slave-trading post in Africa. In Glasgow’s Merchant City, streets named for Jamaica, Antigua, and Tobago indicate the neighbourhood’s development in the eighteenth century by the “Tobacco Lords” and the “Sugar Aristocracy.” But in Manchester, which prior to the opening of the Ship Canal in 1894 was not a port city, the metropolis’ involvement with American and West Indian slavery is less obvious. However, its immense economic and physical expansion in the first half of the nineteenth century was rooted in slave-grown products. “Cottonopolis” was also the site of a deeply-rooted anti-slavery movement, and a number of ex-slave abolitionist activists visited and even resided there.

Looking through Library’s catalogue, I found that slavery and abolition were subjects which had interested the institution’s members from its earliest days. The collection included a pamphlet in which George Hibbert, a leading sugar planter descended from an old Mancunian family, employed graceful, reasoned prose to dismiss the claims of the Society of Friends regarding the evils of enslaved labour.
In contrast, a nearby shelf held Joseph Sturge and Thomas Harvey’s abolitionist text The West Indies in 1837. The authors travelled throughout the Caribbean immediately after Emancipation in response to reports that ex-slaves were still being mistreated by their former owners. A wrenching passage describes their encounter with Susan Mackenzie, an elderly woman who was “almost blind from the effects of flogging”—and who had laboured on a Hibbert plantation.
A depiction of machine technology becomes a slave’s manual for “the decommissioning of plantation machinery” through sabotage, and images of rococo design are supplemented with equally elegant illustrations of white hands clasping elaborate whips. Evans’ and Piper’s works force the viewer to see white success and black suffering as inextricably connected in this aspect of British history.
This image, in combination with Himid’s literal insertion of the work of an African artist into an English book, symbolises the elusive but constant presence of the history of slavery in Manchester.
Natalie Zacek is senior lecturer in American Studies at the University of Manchester. Her work focusses on race, slavery, gender, and material culture, and she is currently working on a study of the cultural role of horse-racing in the nineteenth-century United States.
The exhibition “Bittersweet: Legacies of Slavery and Abolition in Manchester” is on view at the Portico Library in Manchester city centre through 14 October.
Correction: An edit was made to this blog on 10 June 2020 to fix an error. The original version of the blog published on 22 September 2017 stated that the future Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel (1788 – 1850) signed a petition that same year for the continuation of the trade. This was incorrect. It was his father, also called Robert Peel (1750 – 1830), who organised and signed the petition.
Hi
I read this article (http://www.historymatters.group.shef.ac.uk/unburying-history-slavery-manchester/) with some interest, and I think there is a mistake in it. A mistake that is at risk of causing conflict in my home town and has been cited as a source in a news article further inflaming tensions.
Can you please show me your evidence for the former Prime Minister, Sir Robert Peel signing a petition about slavery?
I found what I assume to be the petition you refer to in this article in the parliamentary archives. Robert Peel, 1st Baronet raised this a petition in 1807. Robert Peel, future PM was still at university at this age, and was too young to have the vote. The petition was signed by the future Prime Ministers father, not him. The parliamentary archive is quite clear which Peel signed it. (Link to petition in parliamentary archives can be found here https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/tradeindustry/slavetrade/from-the-parliamentary-collections/the-british-slave-trade/petition-against-the-foreign-slave-trade-abolition-bill-page-1/petition-against-the-foreign-slave-trade-abolition-act-page-2/?fbclid=IwAR3gmESajhgYgU09JbXl-3XD0YaAElHlDk6zSbs-UsARabeU4e4qsgK8xVM)
I am not saying you are wrong, you may be referring to a different petition, but can you please provide a link to this as I would like to find out more.
Hi there,
I just wanted to say thank you for sharing your article. It’s 2020 and I was actually looking up Sir Robert Peel jr when I came across this. Thanks to you there are many others that I feel inspired to research and educate myself on.